Similarities Between “Anthem” and the Creation Story Essay Sample free essay sample

Possibly the most good known narrative of the Holy Bible is that of the creative activity narrative. In this narrative. God creates the Earth in six yearss and remainders on the seventh. after making visible radiation. dark. oceans. and animate beings of all types. When he feels that there should be animals other than animate beings. he creates adult male. in His image. He names this adult male Adam. and so creates a opposite number for his new creative activity. Eve. Adam and Eve lived together in harmoniousness with God and all the other animate beings in the Garden of Eden. a Eden where immorality did non be. and their lone regulation was to non eat from the tree of Knowledge. However. Adam and Eve. under the enticement of the snake. showed greed. and wanted to be more like God. so they ate the fruit. in order to go like God. We will write a custom essay sample on Similarities Between â€Å"Anthem† and the Creation Story Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page When compared in deepness. the supporter of the creative activity narrative. Adam. and the street sweeper. Equality 7-2521. of Ayn Rand’s Anthem are condemned work forces. whose narratives are really similar. salvage one key difference. These two work forces were condemned for the exact same ground: they let their greed overpower every other feeling they had. â€Å"â€Å"You will surely non decease. † the snake said to the adult female â€Å"For God knows that when you eat from it ( the tree of cognition ) your eyes will be opened. and you will be like God. cognizing good and evil† ( Genesis 3:4-5 ) . While it was non Adam who though of eating from the tree. he did do the witting determination to fall victim to the ineluctable greed that all worlds are plagued with. Equality 7-2521 fell to the same greed that Adam had. but towards another party. himself. In the society that Equality 7-2521 lives. there is no remarkable â€Å"I† . there is merely â€Å"we† . In fact. the penalty for the denial of the belief that they have adopted. â€Å"What is non done jointly can non be good† ( Rand 73 ) . is decease. When Equality 7-2521 discovers a hole that leads down to a railroad station fro m the â€Å"Unspeakable Times† . he finds himself drawn to it. Equality 7-2521 enjoyed being entirely in the dark of the station. and in making so he was perpetrating a mortal offense in his society. Both of these work forces were subjected to the greed. which was supposed to be nonexistent in their universes. that is undeniably a portion of human nature. and in making so. offended the most powerful figures of their societies. In the Bible. God is the Godhead. the destroyer. and is the individual most powerful entity in the universe of Adam. When Adam and his married woman. Eve. Ate from the tree of cognition. this enraged God. and they were punished greatly for it. â€Å"To Adam He ( God ) said. â€Å"Because you listened to your married woman and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you. ‘You must non eat from it. ’ â€Å"Cursed is the land because of you ; through painful labor you will eat nutrient from it all the yearss of your life. It will bring forth irritants and thistles for you. and you will eat the workss of the field. By the perspiration of your forehead. you will eat your nutrient until you return to the land. since from it you were taken ; for dust you are and dust you are to return† ( Genesis 3:17-19 ) . As a consequence of his noncompliance to God. Adam and his married woman are forced to endure through the hurting of decease. without the comfort of the Gar den of Eden. where decease and hungriness were neer a job. For this ground. they were put on the Earth: to open up a civilisation of their ain. and unrecorded off of it. â€Å"Adam made love to his married woman Eve. and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. She said â€Å"With the aid of the Lord. I have brought away man† Later. she gave birth to his brother Abel† ( Genesis 4:1-2 ) . This. dwelling the Earth. and making a civilisation to populate in. is now Adam and Eve’s precedence. to populate off of others. as they can now see decease. Such a destiny is similar to Equality 7-2521. when he offends the bookmans of his town after demoing them the merchandise of his sedateness. â€Å"How dared you think that your head held greater wisdom than the heads of your brothers? And if the councils had decreed that you should be a Sweet Sweeper. how dare you think that you could be of greater usage to adult male than in brushing the streets? † â€Å"We shall present this animal to the World Council itself and allow their will be done. † ( Rand 71. 72 ) . Equality 7-2521. in his dependence to being entirely. has offende d the â€Å"gods† of his society. similar to God in the creative activity narrative. For his actions. Equality 7-2521 is tortured. and about experiences decease. as Adam does when he offended God by eating of the tree. Equality 7-2521 subsequently flights from his prison. where he was tortured. and made his manner to the â€Å"Uncharted Forest† . a topographic point where no adult male is permitted entryway. He comes across a house from the â€Å"Unspeakable Times† and inhabits it with a fellow refugee. Liberty 5-3000. whom he loves. The undertaking that Equaltiy 7-2521 assigns himself after many yearss of contemplation is to construct up a force against the society of â€Å"we† . He says that he will salvage his friends. â€Å"And they will follow me and I shall take them to my fortress. And here. in this chartless wilderness. I and they. my chosen friends. my fellow-builders. shall compose the first chapter in the history of man† ( Rand 101 ) . Adam and Equality 7-2521 both took it upon themselves to construct a new society when they were cast out of their old 1 for piquing the most powerful figures. However. their results were rather different in how they took their e arful. Adam. after being told that he is capable to trouble and enduring. when God proclaims. â€Å"By the perspiration of your forehead. you will eat your nutrient until you return to the land. since from it you were taken ; for dust you are and dust you are to return† . shows no reaction. It is about as if he accepted his destiny without reproach. which seems really curious. given the old conditions of his life agreement. While Adam solemnly accepts his destiny. Equality 7-2521 embracings it with unfastened weaponries. laughing after he fell from a tree subdivision. upon a bed of moss. so continuing to turn over down the moss bed. branchlets and foliages in his apparels and hair ( Rand 79 ) . The new milieus that Equality 7-2521. who has taken on the name of Prometheus. has inhabited are new and exciting. all around. and he portions it with his lover. Liberty 5-3000. who now goes by Gaea. Adam and Equality 7-2521. or Prometheus. are about one in the same adult male: both fell victim to their ain greed. both offended the â€Å"gods† of their society. and both were deemed castawaies. taking their lovers with them. While the buildup to the flood tide of both the narratives of Adam and Equality 7-2521 are about the same. they branch off from each other towards the terminal. Adam. accepting decease as a world. and Equality 7-2521. accepting new life as a free adult male. While both work forces were presented with less than pleasant state of affairss. they made the best out of them: Adam. protracting the lifetime of the human race with the company of Eve. and Equality 7-2521 defecting from his old place. choosing to get down a new one with Liberty 5-3000 and his friends. traveling to demo that a state of affairs is what one makes of it. non what is already made for them. Plants Cited The Holy Bible: New International Version: Incorporating the Old Testament and the New Testament. Colorado Springs. Carbon monoxide: International Bible Society. 1984.Print. Rand. Ayn. Anthem. New York: Dutton. 1995. Print.

Slavery essays

Slavery essays Tyranny in the land of the free Friends, countrymen, lend me your ears! There is a travesty occurring at this very moment as we speak! What is the name of this disastrous deed? Slavery. People of African descent are being treated as if not human, brutally punished, being held like animals, but worst of all, being traded and sold. In the first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence it clearly states and I quote: that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator [God] end quote. Good people, I ask you this: how can one being hold sway over another!? They are people just like you are; the only difference is that their skin is darker. This is no different than two bottles of water. One of glass and one of wood. Their contents are the same yet their outward appearance is slightly differentiated. There is not enough evidence to prove this as correct behavior. You can even teach an animal etiquette, why not a fellow human being? While in my coach, I passed a slave owner and his slave. The slave smiled at me and recognized me as an abolitionist. To my horror, the white man beat the slave as if he was a dog. Then proceeded to kick at his legs. In my long years as an abolitionist, this was the most despicable thing I had ever seen. I was disgraced to be a human at that very moment. Now, all of you slave owners in the crowd are probably saying that I only seen what is going on in the public and not how you treat the slaves on your plantation. Trying to make an excuse, Oh, we treat them real good on our plantation. Ive seen plantations where slaves are kept in the barn with the cattle and horses. In a poor excuse for a bed, just some hay in a box and a rag as a pillow. While you lie content in a cotton bed with pillows filled with white feathers. Plucked from the freshest of chickens. Which a slave did with his or her own hands! ...

Should The Surveillance Be Done in Public Areas Essay

Should The Surveillance Be Done in Public Areas - Essay Example Introduction of surveillance camera has significantly changed the security issues around the globe. Surveillance chiefly involves paying close and frequent attention to someone or something (Tavani, 2001). This is usually for a particular reason, whether private or public and for a certain period of time. In addition surveillance usually takes many forms, such as listening and smelling devices and wiretapping, but in this case, it is important to focus on surveillance involving cameras, placed in either public or private areas. From when you walk out of your house, in most cities, you are being watched (Parenti, 2003). This is because the cameras are now installed in major city streets, gas stations, retail shops and transport systems such as trains. The use of surveillance cameras doubled in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York City. These prompted frantic efforts, to curb terrorism, a major threat to security in this century. There is a need to identify the ethic s of surveillance cameras. Historically, the idea of watching the public by a select few, especially those who control us politically and economically can be traced to the Panoptical (Foucault, 1977). This was a kind of prison design, built in such a way that a single guard could watch the prisoners in a single gaze. This is a big way induces prisoners in a state of conscious and permanent knowledge that they are being watched. Foucault saw surveillance as productive machinery of continuous mind control, which is somehow what current surveillance cameras represent. Therefore, what the papers seek to argue the need for new ethics in the surveillance camera industry, because of the reasons below. This is because surveillance when done correctly and for the right reasons and people, individuals involved end up surrendering apart of their civil liberty to privacy, for the sake of public security. Closed -circuit televisions when placed in public areas, give people a sense of security, r educe crime by up to five percent. Up to ninety percent of respondents saw no problem in having such surveillance in public areas. Surveillance done in the above manner, by the correct agencies, can be said to be ethical and legal. On the other hand, there is need to look at the ethics of surveillance cameras, by looking at who does it and for what they will be used to do, therefore the ethics of surveillance cameras. Ethics is defined by the BBC online, as a system of moral principles. This is what is good for the individual and society, therefore is responsible for holding the society together. The ethics of surveillance cameras therefore seeks to look at the circumstances surrounding the use of such cameras, and just how much harm can be done if it finds itself in the wrong hands. Foucault, 1994, referred to surveillance carried out by the government as being watched by â€Å"big brother†, which would encourage good behavior amongst the general population, due to the fact that people would think that they are being watched, even when they are not. As earlier stated, this discussion is not that surveillance cameras should go, rather that it should be done in public areas, by the right people. The main areas in a person’s life most affected by surveillance cameras are trust, privacy, and autonomy (Parenti, 2003). First, surveillance cameras usually infringe on a person’s privacy, mostly when it is done in their private time and within their private property. Concerns on privacy have been here since way back, and have increased with continuous improvement in technology.

Trade unions in the work place can only have a negative impact on Essay

Trade unions in the work place can only have a negative impact on productivity - Essay Example In 1932 when middle class males won the right to vote in Great Britain all the reformation started. Workers formed societies and in due course it was called trade unions. The aim of trade unions was to fight for better working conditions and better pay as a result changes were also brought to the working conditions such as 10 hour work days, child labour laws and required school. Therefore, a trade union is an organization which was formed to promote and protect the interests of a collection of workers. Often it was found that the interest of the trade union and the companies or factories had clashes that result in less productivity. This paper aims to provide information on how trade unions have had an impact on productivity. From the initial stages of its formation trade unions are the workers' representative when deciding on the wages or working conditions with employers and/or governments. The status of trade union varies for country to country or state to state. While in some countries trade unions possess substantial freedom, from the right to Freedom of Association, to public demonstrations and active protest against political opponents such as strikes, in other countries it is totally opposite. In these countries the trade unions are actively suppressed by political or military rules, with little or no freedoms. Besides, in these countries the prospect of violence or even death is high. ... In every country these unions are further divided into "locals", and are often united in national federations. These federations themselves will affiliate with Internationals, such as the International Trade Union Confederation. Over the last few decades, trade unions have developed into a number of forms propagandize by differing political and economic regimes. The main aims, objectives and activities of trade unions vary but by and large can be categorized as follows: Trade unions in the early days, such as the Friendly Societies, often offered a number of benefits to insure members against unemployment, ill health, old age and funeral expenses. Friendly Societies was formed in 1881 under the Trade Union Act, the Registrar of Friendly Societies was in charge for registering industrial bodies as well as trade unions in the state of New South Wales. Similarly, in many industrialized countries, these functions have been taken up by the state. In addition, the provision of professional training, legal advice, and representation for members still remain among the main benefits of trade union membership. The second and one of the most important aims of trade union is that they are able to operate openly, are legal bodies and are recognised by employers, they may negotiate with employers over wages and working conditions. When their demands are not met, trade unions may organize strikes or resistance to lockouts if their particular goals are not agreed by the authorities. Trade unions may also encourage legislation favourable to the interests of their members or workers as a whole. They may also go to the extent of

Crooks Of Mice and Men Essay Example for Free

Crooks Of Mice and Men Essay George Milton -â€Å"I been mean, ain’t I?†   George is a good friend to Lennie. He protects him and does what is necessary to keep him out of trouble. -â€Å"If I was alone I could live so easy†   Lennie is a burden to George -â€Å"I want you to stay with me, Lennie† –George   conveys Georges loneliness Lennie Small -â€Å"paws†   animalistic quality; bear -â€Å"all you can ever remember is them rabbits† –George. Lennie represents idealism and optimism in the American dream. â€Å"rabbits† symbol of freedom and peace of mind. -â€Å"he’s jus’ like a kid† –Slim   describes him perfectly -â€Å"why do you got to get killed?† –Lennie no understanding of actions or consequences. â€Å"its mean here† –Lennie too innocent to cope with harsh environment -hallucination of Aunt Clare: main moral figure in his life. Tells him between right and wrong and about consequence. Crooks/Racism -â€Å"crooks†   nickname due to injury. Name given to him by other ranchers dominance, possession (slavery) -â€Å"California Civil Code for 1905† had aspirations once of being successful. Educated individual. ( had â€Å"books†) 1905 tho! 25 years out of dates   shows futility of his situation. -â€Å"crooks was a proud, aloof man† Steinbeck does not aim to victimize/generalize Crooks. He’s 3 dimensional; knows his worth. BUT has no power to change his fate. -location of Crooks in ranch (barn) symbolizes his distance the other men. Explicitly: segregation, metaphorically: emotional distance/loneliness -â€Å"they’ll tie ya up with a collar, like a dog†-Crooks. When Crooks finally finds someone weaker than him, he feels he must destroy them. Relates to his own oppression. Suffering leads to cruelty. -â€Å"difficult for Crooks to conceal his pleasure with anger† shows his desperation for contact. He has become hardened by h is pain but lets his guard down at times. -â€Å"drew into himself†   crooks forces to accept his oppression. Powerless in his fate. Curley’s Wife/Women -â€Å"that glove’s fulla Vaseline† –Candy ( Curley’s mark of dominance over his wife; she’s an object to him, a trophy. AND clear warning to other men) -â€Å"Curley’s wife† no name. dehumanization. -â€Å"fingernails were red†   symbol of danger, sexuality, blood, passion. Stoplight! She will be cause of danger later in novel. -â€Å"rolled clusters, like sausages† childlike, naà ¯ve little girl. Contrasts with red. -â€Å"heavily made up†   suggest she’s hiding the true here. Underneath surface there is hidden personality: loneliness, desperate, need, kindness. Puts on front of sexuality and flirtatiousness. ALSO conveys men on the ranch only care about sex from women. -â€Å"what a tramp† –George ïÆ'   hypocritical view towards women. Has sex with prostitutes but calls her a tart da fuq +!! Objectification. Ironic cuz what she really wants is human contact not sex. The men don’t even consider that she could have more complexity other than wanted a man physically. -ranch is a patriarchal environment. -â€Å"I get lonely† –Curley’s wife (mask taken off, complexity revealed) Candy -Him and his disability aid in themes of minority, oppression, and loneliness. -â€Å"the swamper warmed to his gossip† ïÆ'   he needs a distraction from his own, unsatisfying life. Friendship â€Å"stayed behind the other†   symbolizes how they always protect each other â€Å"we got somebody to talk to† importance of friendship, especially at times of hardship. Human contact takes away loneliness Loneliness/Isolation â€Å"a guy goes nuts if he ain’t got nobody† –Crooks â€Å"suppose you ain’t got nobody† –Crooks almost ironic; Crooks doesn’t realize that everyone is alone in this environment. His pain consumes and blinds him, he isn’t the only one who’s feeling it. The American Dream -â€Å"you give me a good whore house every time† although they want to achieve their dream, they waste their money on prostitutes and booze. Cycle of pain and desperation, a temporary void of loneliness and boredom that has to be filled. -â€Å"every damn on of ‘em’s got a little piece of land in his head† –Crooks Crook’s knows reality of American Dream. Faced this for long long time due to racism. -â€Å"they left all the weak ones here† –Curley’s wife   themes of novella come full circle. Oppression of minorities.

knowledge and information :: essays research papers

I would now like to make reference to legislation that highlights the importance of how Council protects and processes it. The Data Protection Act of 1984 has been revised and the new 1998 Act was brought into force on 1 March 2000. The new act changes original definitions and meanings and it broadens the scope of the original act. There are eight principles within the act and it differentiates between personal data and sensitive personal data. Sensitive personal data covers:  ·Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Racial or ethnic origin of the data subject.  ·Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Political opinion.  ·Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Religious or spiritual belief.  ·Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Whether or not a member of a trade union.  ·Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Physical or mental health or condition.  ·Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Sexual life.  ·Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The record of any alleged or actual criminal activity or sentencing.  ·Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  (HMSO, 1998, PartI). The act comprises the following eight principles: First Principle . As indicated previously personal data must be processed fairly and lawfully and at least one of the processing conditions is met. In relating this to Council in the case of processing sensitive personal data, the data must be processed fairly and lawfully and at least one of the conditions for processing sensitive personal data is met. Second Principle. Personal data shall be obtained only for one or more specified and lawful purposes, and shall not be further processed in any manner incompatible with that purpose or those purposes. Third Principle. Personal data shall be adequate, relevant and not excessive in relation to the purpose or purposes for which they are processed. Fourth Principle. Personal data shall be accurate and where necessary kept up to date. Fifth Principle. Personal data processed for any purpose or purposes shall not be kept for longer than is necessary for that purpose or those purposes. Sixth Principle. Personal data shall be processed in accordance with the rights of data subjects under this act. Seventh Principle. Appropriate technical and organisational measures shall be taken against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data and against accidental loss or destruction of, or damage to, personal data. Eighth Principle. Personal data shall not be transferred to a country or territory outside the European Economic Area, unless that country or territory ensures an adequate level of protection for the rights and freedoms of data subjects in relation to the processing of personal data. (HMSO 1998, cited by DOH, 2000, pp.1-8). Clearly, the above legislation reinforces the importance of managing information and knowledge within a contemporary organisation such as Council. Such legislation not only seeks to safeguard the rights of service-users who access my organisation but also to offer rules to Council in terms of appropriateness of processing information and knowledge.

Warren and Rehnquist and the Effects of Major Court Cases on the Law Enforcement of Today

Have you thought about how much the Supreme Court decisions really affect your life and what we do on a daily basis or how important these decisions are to our civil liberties? Earl Warren and William Rehnquist are two of the most well knows Supreme Court Chief Justices. Each having different opinions on the importance’s of civil liberties and public order maintenance. Many of the court cases that each Chief Justice would hear would change the very way that we live today. As well as how law enforcement interact with regards to the 5th, 6th, 8th, and 14th Amendments. In this essay we will discuss compare and contrast the Chief Justice Earl Warrens Court versus the William Rehnquist Court, with special regards to how they effected the law enforcements, then finally addressing how the current Supreme Court balances out civil liberties against public order maintenance. Earl Warren was born on March 19, 1891 in Los Angeles, California. He attended the University of California, Berkeley, he majored in political science for three years before entering UBS’s School of Law. He received his B. S. degree in 1912 and his J. D. degree in 1914. On May 14, he was admitted to the California Bar (http://warren. csd. edu/about/biography. html). After he graduated Warren got hired on at law offices in San Francisco and Oakland. In 1925, he was appointed Alameda County district attorney when the incumbent resigned. He won election to the post in his own right in 1926,1930, and 1934. During his fourteen years as district attorney, Warren developed a reputatio n as a crime fighter. In those years he never had a conviction reversed by a higher court. Earl Warren was a republican although he had broad bipartisan support because of his centrist to liberal views. He was then elected to governorships of California in 1942, 1946, and 1950. In 1953 President Dwight D. Eisenhower appointed Earl Warren the fourteenth Chief Justice of the United States. Earl Warren is one of the most well know Chief Justice because of his most popular Supreme Court decisions in the case Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, 1955, which ended segregation in school. This decision and many others like this are important cases that the Earl Warren Court made. The Warren Court left a legacy of judicial activism in civil rights law and individual liberties. The focus was specifically on the rights of the accused as addressed in Amendments 4 through 8. In the period from 1961 to 1969, the Warren Court examined almost every aspect of the criminal justice system in the United States, using the 14th Amendment to extend constitutional protections to all courts in every State. This process became known as the â€Å"nationalization† of the Bill of Rights. The Warren Court's revolution in the criminal justice system began with the case of Mapp vs. Ohio (367 U. S. 643 [1961]) (http://www. infoplease. com/us/supreme-court/cases/ar19. html). In 1957 Cleveland, Ohio, police thought a bombing suspect, and illegal betting equipment might be in Dollree Mapp’s home. Three officers went to Mapp’s home and asked permission to search, but Mapp refused. Mapp requested the police obtain a search warrant. Two officers left the home while one remained. About three hours later, the two officers returned with several other police officers. The returning officers flashed a piece of paper at Mapp, and broke her door entering the residence. Mapp asked to see the â€Å"warrant† and took it from an officer, putting it down the front of her dress. The police fought with Mapp and regained the paper. They handcuffed the non-compliant Mapp for being belligerent. Police did not find the bombing suspect or the betting equipment during the conduct of their search, but found some pornography in a suitcase by Mapp's bed. Mapp said that she had loaned the suitcase to a renter and the contents were not her property. Mapp was arrested, prosecuted, tried found guilty, and sentenced for possession of the pornography. No search warrant had been obtained during the course of the investigation of this case, and was not produced as evidence at her trial. When Mapp vs. Ohio reached the Supreme Court in 1961, the decided in a five to four decision that the exclusionary rule applies to the states. It concluded that other remedies, such as reliance on the due process clause to enforce fourth amendment violations had proven worthless and futile. In this landmark case, it changed the way law enforcement at the state level operated. Where illegally obtained evidence had been admissible in State Courts previously, now under the Mapp ruling this would no longer be tolerated. In another landmark case Terry vs. Ohio (392 U. S. 1 [1968]) Martin McFadden, a police detective for 39 years, was patrolling the streets of Cleveland, Ohio, on October 31, 1963. In the afternoon, McFadden saw two men, John Terry and Richard Chilton, hanging out on a street corner. McFadden's training and experience told him the two men looked suspicious, so he began to watch them from nearby. As McFadden watched, Terry and Chilton took turns walking past and looking inside a store window, they did this twelve times. At that point a third man joined them for a brief discussion on the street corner. Ten minutes later they headed down the street in the same direction as the third man whom they had met. McFadden believed the three men were getting ready to rob the store they were casing. McFadden again through his training and experience believed the suspects were armed and dangerous. McFadden followed Terry and Chilton and confronted them in front of Zucker's store with the third man. McFadden said he was a police officer and asked their names, and received only mumbled responses. McFadden grabbed Terry, spun him around to face the other two men, and frisked him. McFadden felt a gun inside Terry's coat, and ordered the men inside the business. Inside, McFadden removed Terry's overcoat and found a . 38 caliber revolver. McFadden ordered the three men against the wall, and patted them down. McFadden found an additional revolver in Chilton's overcoat. Ohio convicted Terry and Chilton of carrying concealed weapons. In an eight to one decision, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Ohio stating the police officer’s training and experience in this case gave him â€Å"reasonable suspicion† a robbery was going to occur. This allowed him to stop and frisk the suspects, which led to him finding pistols on two of them. From this court case the Supreme Court concluded reasonable suspicion is required to stop and frisk a person.